The Persian Version of the “Life Satisfaction Scale”: Construct Validity and Test-Re-Test Reliability among Iranian Older Adults
After forward-backward translation, the LSS was administered to 334 Persian speaking, cognitively healthy elderly aged 60 years and over recruited through convenience sampling. To analyze the validity of the model’s constructs and the relationships between the constructs, a confirmatory factor analy...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cross-cultural gerontology Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 121 - 134 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2018
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | After forward-backward translation, the LSS was administered to 334 Persian speaking, cognitively healthy elderly aged 60 years and over recruited through convenience sampling. To analyze the validity of the model’s constructs and the relationships between the constructs, a confirmatory factor analysis followed by PLS analysis was performed. The Construct validity was further investigated by calculating the correlations between the LSS and the “Short Form Health Survey” (SF-36) subscales measuring similar and dissimilar constructs. The LSS was re-administered to 50 participants a month later to assess the reliability. For the eight-factor model of the life satisfaction construct, adequate goodness of fit between the hypothesized model and the model derived from the sample data was attained (positive and statistically significant beta coefficients, good R-squares and acceptable GoF). Construct validity was supported by convergent and discriminant validity, and correlations between the LSS and SF-36 subscales. Minimum Intraclass Correlation Coefficient level of 0.60 was exceeded by all subscales. Minimum level of reliability indices (Cronbach’s α, composite reliability and indicator reliability) was exceeded by all subscales. The Persian-version of the Life Satisfaction Scale is a reliable and valid instrument, with psychometric properties which are consistent with the original version. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0169-3816 1573-0719 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10823-017-9340-6 |