Biometric identity systems in law enforcement and the politics of (voice) recognition: The case of SiiP

Biometric identity systems are now a prominent feature of contemporary law enforcement, including in Europe. Often advanced on the premise of efficiency and accuracy, they have also been the subject of significant controversy. Much attention has focussed on longer-standing biometric data collection,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBig data & society Vol. 8; no. 2
Main Authors Jansen, Fieke, Sánchez-Monedero, Javier, Dencik, Lina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.07.2021
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2053-9517
2053-9517
DOI10.1177/20539517211063604

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biometric identity systems are now a prominent feature of contemporary law enforcement, including in Europe. Often advanced on the premise of efficiency and accuracy, they have also been the subject of significant controversy. Much attention has focussed on longer-standing biometric data collection, such as finger-printing and facial recognition, foregrounding concerns with the impact such technologies can have on the nature of policing and fundamental human rights. Less researched is the growing use of voice recognition in law enforcement. This paper examines the case of the recent Speaker Identification Integrated Project, a European wide initiative to create the first international and interoperable database of voice biometrics, now the third largest biometric database at Interpol. Drawing on Freedom of Information requests, interviews and public documentation, we outline the emergence and features of SiiP and explore how voice is recognised and attributed meaning. We understand Speaker Identification Integrated Project as constituting a particular ‘regime of recognition’ premised on the use of soft biometrics (age, language, accent and gender) to disembed voice in order to optimise for difference. This, in turn, has implications for the nature and scope of law enforcement, people's position in society, and justice concerns more broadly.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2053-9517
2053-9517
DOI:10.1177/20539517211063604