A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes

The force applied during laryngoscopy can cause local tissue trauma and can induce cardiovascular responses and cervical spine movement in susceptible patients. Previous studies have identified numerous operator and patient factors that influence the amount of force applied during intubation. There...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnaesthesia and intensive care Vol. 39; no. 6; pp. 1098 - 1102
Main Authors RUSSELL, T, LEE, C, FIRAT, M, COOPER, R. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Edgecliff Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists 01.11.2011
Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The force applied during laryngoscopy can cause local tissue trauma and can induce cardiovascular responses and cervical spine movement in susceptible patients. Previous studies have identified numerous operator and patient factors that influence the amount of force applied during intubation. There are few studies evaluating the effect of different laryngoscope blades and no study involving video laryngoscopes. In this study we measured the forces using two laryngoscopic techniques. Three FlexiForce Sensors (A201-25, Tekscan, Boston, MA, USA) were attached to the concave blade surface of a Macintosh and a GlideScope laryngoscope. Experienced anaesthetists performed Macintosh and GlideScope intubations on the Laerdal Airway Management Trainer manikin. Compared to Macintosh intubations, the GlideScope intubations had equal or superior views of the glottis with 55%, 58% and 66% lower median peak, average and impulse forces applied to the tongue base. The distal sensor registered the most force in both devices and the force distribution pattern was similar between the devices. The findings suggest that the GlideScope requires less force for similar or better laryngoscopic views, at least in a manikin model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0310-057X
1448-0271
DOI:10.1177/0310057x1103900619