Revising the Malthusian Narrative: The Comparative Study of Population Dynamics in Late Imperial China

Ever since malthus, it has been conventional to cast the Chinese and European preindustrial demographic systems as opposing archetypes—Europe as a model of demographic restraint, China as demographic profligate. Europe's moderate population growth, fertility control keyed to economic conditions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of Asian studies Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 714 - 748
Main Authors Lavely, William, Wong, R. Bin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.08.1998
Association for Asian Studies
Duke University Press, NC & IL
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ever since malthus, it has been conventional to cast the Chinese and European preindustrial demographic systems as opposing archetypes—Europe as a model of demographic restraint, China as demographic profligate. Europe's moderate population growth, fertility control keyed to economic conditions, and favorable living standards are contrasted with China's rapid growth, periodic mortality crises, and precarious balance of population and resources. Although there is some variation in approaches and vocabularies reflecting disciplinary divisions, and recognition of the substantial variability of institutions within Europe and China, this stylized contrast continues to flourish in the demographic and historical literatures. Its persistence is important because Malthusian dynamics underlie a popular and persuasive set of explanations for the divergent paths of Chinese and European economies and societies in the industrial era. In this article we challenge this conventional dichotomy and its empirical underpinnings.
Bibliography:ArticleID:00380
istex:DD949E4F1DD277448202278209C96D3B30405ACA
ark:/67375/6GQ-NF831SCK-Q
PII:S0021911800003806
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-9118
1752-0401
DOI:10.2307/2658739