Gesture Recognition by Ensemble Extreme Learning Machine Based on Surface Electromyography Signals

In the recent years, gesture recognition based on the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals has been extensively studied. However, the accuracy and stability of gesture recognition through traditional machine learning algorithms are still insufficient to some actual application scenarios. To enhan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 911204
Main Authors Peng, Fulai, Chen, Cai, Lv, Danyang, Zhang, Ningling, Wang, Xingwei, Zhang, Xikun, Wang, Zhiyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Frontiers Research Foundation 16.06.2022
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the recent years, gesture recognition based on the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals has been extensively studied. However, the accuracy and stability of gesture recognition through traditional machine learning algorithms are still insufficient to some actual application scenarios. To enhance this situation, this paper proposed a method combining feature selection and ensemble extreme learning machine (EELM) to improve the recognition performance based on sEMG signals. First, the input sEMG signals are preprocessed and 16 features are then extracted from each channel. Next, features that mostly contribute to the gesture recognition are selected from the extracted features using the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm. Then, several independent ELM base classifiers are established using the selected features. Finally, the recognition results are determined by integrating the results obtained by ELM base classifiers using the majority voting method. The Ninapro DB5 dataset containing 52 different hand movements captured from 10 able-bodied subjects was used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The results showed that the proposed method could perform the best (overall average accuracy 77.9%) compared with decision tree (DT), ELM, and random forest (RF) methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Edited by: Masayuki Hirata, Osaka University, Japan
This article was submitted to Brain-Computer Interfaces, a section of the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Reviewed by: Federica Verdini, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy; Ejay Nsugbe, Nsugbe Research Labs, United Kingdom
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2022.911204