Assessing and Quantifying Air Added to the Voice by Means of Laryngostroboscopic Imaging, EGG, and Acoustics in Vocally Trained Subjects

To assess and quantify singers’ strategies for adding air to phonation to sound “breathy” in a healthy manner Case-control study with 20 professional singers. Twenty singers were recorded performing sustained vowels in the Complete Vocal Technique Neutral vocal mode with and without audible air adde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of voice Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 326.e1 - 326.e11
Main Authors Aaen, Mathias, McGlashan, Julian, Thu, Khaing Thu, Sadolin, Cathrine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess and quantify singers’ strategies for adding air to phonation to sound “breathy” in a healthy manner Case-control study with 20 professional singers. Twenty singers were recorded performing sustained vowels in the Complete Vocal Technique Neutral vocal mode with and without audible air added to the voice by means of laryngostroboscopic imaging using a videonasoendoscopic camera system, electroglottography, long-term average spectrum, as well as acoustic signals and audio perception. Singers completed Voice Handicap Index and Reflux Symptom Index questionnaires prior to examination. Air added to the voice resulted in an expected glottal gap along the length of the vocal folds, with little to no further difference in the supraglottic area, as compared with the Neutral phonation. Air added resulted in lowered Qx, mean Sound Pressure Level, and Cepstral Peak Prominence, but higher Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio, Jitter, and Shimmer, with decreased energy at the fundamental frequency. Adding audible air to the phonation did not exhibit similar effects on acoustics for males and females. Also, for females, H1–H2 difference decreased with air added, while it increased for males. Singers produce an audible airy phonation similar yet significantly different to the breathy phonation reported for both healthy and pathological speakers.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0892-1997
1873-4588
1873-4588
DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.09.001