In situ fluoride retention and remineralization of incipient carious lesions after the application of different concentrations of fluoride

Limited information is available on the time‐dependent or dosage‐dependent cariostatic efficacy of highly concentrated fluoride compounds. This good clinical practice‐conforming, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover in situ study tested the hypothesis that a 1.0% amine fluoride fluid is super...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of oral sciences Vol. 117; no. 1; pp. 58 - 63
Main Authors Altenburger, Markus J., Schirrmeister, Jörg F., Lussi, Adrian, Klasser, Manfred, Hellwig, Elmar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Limited information is available on the time‐dependent or dosage‐dependent cariostatic efficacy of highly concentrated fluoride compounds. This good clinical practice‐conforming, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover in situ study tested the hypothesis that a 1.0% amine fluoride fluid is superior to a 0.5% amine fluoride fluid regarding fluoride retention and mineral change in initial caries enamel lesions over a period of 28 d. Fluoride retention was significantly higher after application of the two fluoride fluids compared with placebo but had decreased in both groups to similar levels after only 1 wk. Mineral gain was significantly higher for both verum groups compared with placebo. The use of 1% fluoride fluid resulted in significantly higher remineralization compared with the use of 0.5% fluoride fluid. For both fluoride fluids mineral gain followed a linear relationship with time during the experimental period, indicating a possible further uptake of mineral, even after 4 wk.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-8574G431-Q
ArticleID:EOS585
istex:84045349B82CA12281A9DF065BF1F04B7E0B15E4
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0909-8836
1600-0722
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00585.x