Effect of various surface treatment methods on the bond strength of the heat-pressed ceramic samples

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 790 - 797
• Main Authors: Saraçoğlu, A., Cura, C., Çötert, H. S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.08.2004
• Subjects: Dental Bonding; Dental Porcelain; Dental Veneers; Dentistry; etching; heat-pressed ceramic; Hot Temperature; hydrofluoric acid; IPS Empress; shear bond strength; Stress, Mechanical; surface treatment methods
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01305.x

summary  This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the interaction between the shear bond strength and the surface treatment method for a commercial dental ceramic. Ninety bonded ceramic units were manufactured for this study. Each unit was made by luting two cylinder‐shaped ceramic samples to each other with a resin‐composite luting agent. The units were then divided into nine groups, containing 10 units in each group. Samples from each group were treated with one of the following: etching with 4·9% hydrofluoric acid for 10, 20 and 40 s, 9·5% hydrofluoric acid for 10, 20 and 40 s, 40% orthophosphoric acid for 40 s, air abrasion with alumina in 50‐μm particles, and grinding with a high‐speed diamond bur. The treated samples were then silanated and luted with a resin‐composite luting agent. The luted units were then loaded to failure. Two samples from each group were neither silanated nor luted after the surface treatment procedure, and morphological changes obtained by various surface treatment regimens were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. A statistically significant difference was observed among the mean shear bond strengths of the groups prepared with different surface treatment techniques (P = 0·00). Hydrofluoric acid appeared to be the most suitable chemical medium to produce a reliable ceramic bond. Etching time and concentration of the acidic medium were also observed as important prognostic variates. Orthophosphoric acid treatment was observed to be the least effective surface treatment method on the heat‐pressed ceramic samples. Physical applications such as bur grinding and air blasting maintained stronger bonds than the orthophosphoric acid, while producing weaker bonds than surfaces treated with hydrofluoric acid in all concentrations and etching periods. The effect of the silane priming agent was not considered in this study.