Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series

de Andrade LGM, Rodrigues MAM, Romeiro FG, Carvalho MFC. Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series. 
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01514.x. 
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. :  The purpose of this article was to report a series of 23...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical transplantation Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 345 - 350
Main Authors de Andrade, Luís G.M., Rodrigues, Maria A.M., Romeiro, Fernando G., Carvalho, Maria F.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2012
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:de Andrade LGM, Rodrigues MAM, Romeiro FG, Carvalho MFC. Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series. 
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01514.x. 
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. :  The purpose of this article was to report a series of 23 renal transplant recipients with histologically proven and immunohistochemically confirmed cytomegalovirus (CMV) lesions in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and to assess the risk factors associated with severe disease/mortality. CMV patients (n = 23) were allocated into two groups: those who died (n = 6) and those considered cured (n = 17). Overall mortality rate was 26% (6/23). Initial symptoms suggestive of lower GIT involvement were observed in all death cases and in 35.3% of those cured (p = 0.01). Enterorrhagia was seen in 83.3% of the patients who died. Death risk increased twofold (RR 2 [1.13–3.52], p = 0.01) when symptoms of lower GIT involvement were initially observed and sixfold when enterrohagia was present (RR 6 [1.1–35.9], p = 0.001). Among death cases, mean time at diagnosis was significantly more distant (2002 ± 2.9 × 2008 ± 1.6, p = 0.04). The difference in mortality rates seen as service practices changed along the years demonstrates the importance of early diagnosis.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CTR1514
istex:F34ACBB0F3DDAE51D60B73B97760161894EDADBF
ark:/67375/WNG-89Q9NDQH-V
Conflict of interest: None.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01514.x