Noninvasive neuromodulation of subregions of the human insula differentially affect pain processing and heart-rate variability: a within-subjects pseudo-randomized trial
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.This is the first study in humans demonstrating noninvasive modulation of insula subregions to affect pain ratings, brain physiology related to pain (the contact heat-evoked potential), and also metrics of autonomic/cardiovascular activity includ...
Saved in:
Published in | Pain (Amsterdam) Vol. 165; no. 7; pp. 1625 - 1641 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Wolters Kluwer
01.07.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.This is the first study in humans demonstrating noninvasive modulation of insula subregions to affect pain ratings, brain physiology related to pain (the contact heat-evoked potential), and also metrics of autonomic/cardiovascular activity including heart-rate variability.
AbstractThe insula is an intriguing target for pain modulation. Unfortunately, it lies deep to the cortex making spatially specific noninvasive access difficult. Here, we leverage the high spatial resolution and deep penetration depth of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to nonsurgically modulate the anterior insula (AI) or posterior insula (PI) in humans for effect on subjective pain ratings, electroencephalographic (EEG) contact heat-evoked potentials, as well as autonomic measures including heart-rate variability (HRV). In a within-subjects, repeated-measures, pseudo-randomized trial design, 23 healthy volunteers received brief noxious heat pain stimuli to the dorsum of their right hand during continuous heart-rate, electrodermal, electrocardiography and EEG recording. Low-intensity focused ultrasound was delivered to the AI (anterior short gyrus), PI (posterior longus gyrus), or under an inert Sham condition. The primary outcome measure was pain rating. Low-intensity focused ultrasound to both AI and PI similarly reduced pain ratings but had differential effects on EEG activity. Low-intensity focused ultrasound to PI affected earlier EEG amplitudes, whereas LIFU to AI affected later EEG amplitudes. Only LIFU to the AI affected HRV as indexed by an increase in SD of N-N intervals and mean HRV low-frequency power. Taken together, LIFU is an effective noninvasive method to individually target subregions of the insula in humans for site-specific effects on brain biomarkers of pain processing and autonomic reactivity that translates to reduced perceived pain to a transient heat stimulus. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Corresponding author. Address: Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion and School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, 1 Riverside Circle Rm 104, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States. E-mail address: wlegon@vt.edu (W. Legon).Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.painjournalonline.com). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0304-3959 1872-6623 1872-6623 |
DOI: | 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003171 |