Preliminary evidence for the acceptability, safety, and efficacy of the flash technique

• Published in: Frontiers in psychiatry Vol. 14; p. 1273704
• Main Authors: Manfield, Philip E., Taylor, Graham, Dornbush, Edie, Engel, Lewis, Greenwald, Ricky
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.01.2024
• Subjects: EMDR; eye movement desensitization and reprocessing; flash technique; painless; Psychiatry; subliminal; trauma; flash technique; trauma; reexperiencing; painless; flashback; eye movement desensitization and reprocessing; EMDR; subliminal
• ISSN: 1664-0640; 1664-0640
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1273704

This study reports on four similar studies intended to explore the acceptability, safety, and efficacy of the flash technique (FT), a method of rapidly reducing the intensity of a disturbing memory or image, with minimal subjective disturbance for subjects during the process. Of the four studies, two were conducted during FT trainings in the United States, one in Australia, and one in Uganda. The studies involve pre-, post-, and follow-up repeated-measures design to determine the effectiveness of a 15-min FT intervention. A total of 654 subjects were asked to think of a disturbing memory and then participate in a structured experience of an FT. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a brief application of an FT would be safe and effective in significantly reducing their disturbance. In each study, subjects rated their disturbing memories on a 0-to-10 scale, with zero representing no disturbance at all and 10 representing the worst they could imagine. Then, they took part in a 15-min group practicum where they were guided in a self-administering FT with no individual supervision or support. In all four studies, the mean reduction in disturbance exceeded two-thirds, the results were significant (  < 0.001), and the effect size was very large. Of the 813 sessions (654 subjects) represented in these studies, only two subjects reported slight increases in disturbances, and both of these subjects reported reductions in disturbance in their second FT experiences 2 h later. At a 4-week follow-up, mean disturbance levels in all four studies indicated maintenance of benefit or slightly further reduction of mean disturbance levels. An 18-month follow-up study with a subgroup of subjects who initially reported a high level of memory-related distress found similar maintenance of gains as well as symptom reduction. These findings provide preliminary evidence of acceptability, safety, and efficacy of FT; therefore, further study is warranted.