Unravelling structural ambiguities in lithium- and manganese-rich transition metal oxides

Although Li- and Mn-rich transition metal oxides have been extensively studied as high-capacity cathode materials for Li-ion batteries, the crystal structure of these materials in their pristine state is not yet fully understood. Here we apply complementary electron microscopy and spectroscopy techn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature communications Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 8711
Main Authors Shukla, Alpesh Khushalchand, Ramasse, Quentin M., Ophus, Colin, Duncan, Hugues, Hage, Fredrik, Chen, Guoying
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 29.10.2015
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although Li- and Mn-rich transition metal oxides have been extensively studied as high-capacity cathode materials for Li-ion batteries, the crystal structure of these materials in their pristine state is not yet fully understood. Here we apply complementary electron microscopy and spectroscopy techniques at multi-length scale on well-formed Li 1.2 (Ni 0.13 Mn 0.54 Co 0.13 )O 2 crystals with two different morphologies as well as two commercially available materials with similar compositions, and unambiguously describe the structural make-up of these samples. Systematically observing the entire primary particles along multiple zone axes reveals that they are consistently made up of a single phase, save for rare localized defects and a thin surface layer on certain crystallographic facets. More specifically, we show the bulk of the oxides can be described as an aperiodic crystal consisting of randomly stacked domains that correspond to three variants of monoclinic structure, while the surface is composed of a Co- and/or Ni-rich spinel with antisite defects. Lithium and manganese-rich transition metal oxides are a class of promising battery electrodes but their structures are a subject of a controversial debate. Here, the authors use a variety of materials characterization tools to unravel the structural ambiguities in these materials.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AC02-05CH11231
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V)
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/ncomms9711