Social support and self-efficacy multiply mediate the relationship between medical coping style and resilience in patients with type A aortic dissection
Previous research has shown that medical coping modes are associated with resilience in cardiovascular disease patients. However, postoperatively, the mechanism underlying this association in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients is poorly understood. This study investigated the mediating effec...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in psychiatry Vol. 14; p. 1174038 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
31.05.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Previous research has shown that medical coping modes are associated with resilience in cardiovascular disease patients. However, postoperatively, the mechanism underlying this association in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients is poorly understood.
This study investigated the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy on the relationship between medical coping modes and resilience in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients postoperatively.
We assessed 125 patients after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection using the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Social Support Rating Scale, and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Structural equation modeling with AMOS (v.24) was used to test the hypothesized model with multiple mediators. Both direct and mediational effects (through social support and self-efficacy) of medical coping modes on resilience outcomes were examined.
The mean Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score was 63.78 ± 12.29. Confrontation, social support, and self-efficacy correlated with resilience (
= 0.40, 0.23, 0.72, respectively; all
< 0.01). In multiple mediation models, social support independently (effect = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.27) and social support and self-efficacy serially (effect = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.14) mediated the association of confrontation with resilience maintenance, accounting for 57.89 and 10.53% of the total effect, respectively.
Social support and self-efficacy were multiple mediators of the relationship between confrontation and resilience. Interventions designed to facilitate confrontation and subsequently increase social support and self-efficacy may be useful to increase resilience in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Shanshan Wang, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China; Zhen Yang, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, China Edited by: Shen Liu, Anhui Agricultural University, China |
ISSN: | 1664-0640 1664-0640 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1174038 |