Multi-layered e-feedback anxiety: An action research study among Chinese learners using peer feedback activities in an academic writing course

There is a gradual increase in the use of e-feedback in higher education, but issues regarding learners’ anxiety remain unresolved. In light of the learners’ anxiety, e-feedback would essentially become a formality if they are not proactive in providing constructive feedback. This action research ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 14; p. 1062517
Main Authors Xue, Sijia, Yang, Yanchao, Du, Jianxia, Liu, Fangtong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is a gradual increase in the use of e-feedback in higher education, but issues regarding learners’ anxiety remain unresolved. In light of the learners’ anxiety, e-feedback would essentially become a formality if they are not proactive in providing constructive feedback. This action research examines three cycles of e-feedback activities performed by 12 doctoral students in an academic writing course in a public university in Macau, China. Specifically, the e-feedback activity involved a comprehensive use of various new educational technology tools, namely Moodle, WeChat and Rain Classroom. This study reveals that the causes of students’ anxiety when using e-feedback are multi-layered, mainly from the use of smartphones as a communication medium for conducting formal learning activities and the lack of interpersonal and English skills for conveying their thoughts when providing e-feedback. The traditional Chinese culture about the importance of “face” and interpersonal harmony also has impacts on learners’ e-feedback delivery. These findings shed new lights on pedagogical practice in higher education.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Zahra Zohoorian, Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Iran; Davoud Amini, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Iran
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Douglas F. Kauffman, Medical University of the Americas – Nevis, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062517