Quantitative determination of glycopyrrolate in human plasma by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: The use of a volatile ion-pairing agent during both liquid–liquid extraction and liquid chromatography

The work presented here deals with the development of a quantitative tool for the determination of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic glycopyrrolate in human plasma samples. Mepenzolate was used as an internal standard. The plasma samples were subjected to a suitable sample clean-up consisting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Vol. 876; no. 1; pp. 24 - 30
Main Authors Storme, M.L., t’Kindt, R.S., Goeteyn, W., Reyntjens, K., Van Bocxlaer, J.F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.12.2008
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The work presented here deals with the development of a quantitative tool for the determination of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic glycopyrrolate in human plasma samples. Mepenzolate was used as an internal standard. The plasma samples were subjected to a suitable sample clean-up consisting of a simple and relatively fast, two step liquid–liquid ion-pair extraction procedure. The chromatography, using the same volatile ion-pair reagent heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA), takes only 10 min. Relative standard deviation of retention times was never above 2.26% ( n = 36). The method was fully validated based on the US FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. As such, a quantitative ESI-LC–MS(/MS) (TOF mass spectrometry) method was optimized for the absolute quantification of glycopyrrolate in human plasma in a concentration range from 0.101 to 101 ng/mL using a quadratic calibration function ( R 2 = 0.9995), y = −2.21 × 10 −4 (±3.93 × 10 −5) × x 2 + 5.85 × 10 −2 (±5.27 × 10 −3) × x + 4.08 × 10 −3 (±4.82 × 10 −4). For the three QC concentrations (QC 1 0.252, QC 2 2.52, and QC 3 25.2 ng/mL) and the LLOQ (0.101 ng/mL), total precision was under 20% (18.0% ( n = 6) at the LLOQ) and maximum accuracy was 112% (88.9% for the LLOQ, n = 6). Absolute matrix effect (maximum 133% ± 9.59, n = 3), absolute recovery (better than 41.8% ± 2.22, n = 3), relative (inter-subject) matrix effect (maximum 10.9% ± 1.45, n = 4) and process efficiency (better than 45.2% ± 5.74, n = 3) too were assessed at the 3 QC concentrations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1570-0232
1873-376X
DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.013