Quantitative determination of glycopyrrolate in human plasma by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: The use of a volatile ion-pairing agent during both liquid–liquid extraction and liquid chromatography
The work presented here deals with the development of a quantitative tool for the determination of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic glycopyrrolate in human plasma samples. Mepenzolate was used as an internal standard. The plasma samples were subjected to a suitable sample clean-up consisting...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Vol. 876; no. 1; pp. 24 - 30 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.12.2008
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The work presented here deals with the development of a quantitative tool for the determination of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic glycopyrrolate in human plasma samples. Mepenzolate was used as an internal standard. The plasma samples were subjected to a suitable sample clean-up consisting of a simple and relatively fast, two step liquid–liquid ion-pair extraction procedure. The chromatography, using the same volatile ion-pair reagent heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA), takes only 10
min. Relative standard deviation of retention times was never above 2.26% (
n
=
36). The method was fully validated based on the US FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. As such, a quantitative ESI-LC–MS(/MS) (TOF mass spectrometry) method was optimized for the absolute quantification of glycopyrrolate in human plasma in a concentration range from 0.101 to 101
ng/mL using a quadratic calibration function (
R
2
=
0.9995),
y
=
−2.21
×
10
−4 (±3.93
×
10
−5)
×
x
2
+
5.85
×
10
−2 (±5.27
×
10
−3)
×
x
+
4.08
×
10
−3 (±4.82
×
10
−4). For the three QC concentrations (QC
1 0.252, QC
2 2.52, and QC
3 25.2
ng/mL) and the LLOQ (0.101
ng/mL), total precision was under 20% (18.0% (
n
=
6) at the LLOQ) and maximum accuracy was 112% (88.9% for the LLOQ,
n
=
6). Absolute matrix effect (maximum 133%
±
9.59,
n
=
3), absolute recovery (better than 41.8%
±
2.22,
n
=
3), relative (inter-subject) matrix effect (maximum 10.9%
±
1.45,
n
=
4) and process efficiency (better than 45.2%
±
5.74,
n
=
3) too were assessed at the 3 QC concentrations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1570-0232 1873-376X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.013 |