Accuracy, criteria, and clinical significance of visual assessment on diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification for diagnosing acute appendicitis

Purpose To assess the accuracy, criteria, and clinical significance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods Fifty-one patients with right lower abdominal pain [uncomplicated appendicitis (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAbdominal imaging Vol. 44; no. 10; pp. 3235 - 3245
Main Authors Inoue, Akitoshi, Furukawa, Akira, Nitta, Norihisa, Takaki, Kai, Ota, Shinichi, Zen, Yumi, Kojima, Masatsugu, Akabori, Hiroya, Ohta, Hiroyuki, Mekata, Eiji, Saotome, Takao, Murata, Kiyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.10.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To assess the accuracy, criteria, and clinical significance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods Fifty-one patients with right lower abdominal pain [uncomplicated appendicitis ( n  = 25), complicated appendicitis ( n  = 10), and non-appendicitis ( n  = 16)] who underwent MR examination were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently measured appendiceal diameter and wall thickness. They assessed whether a wall defect, an abscess, extraluminal air, or an appendicolith was present on axial T2WI; evaluated intensity on DWI using a 5-point scale; and determined the ADC values of the appendix and peri-appendiceal tissue. Statistical analysis was performed to assess imaging findings for the diagnosis of appendicitis and complicated appendicitis. Cut-off values were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results For diagnosing acute appendicitis, the accuracy improved from 78.4% using only T2WI to 86.3% using combined T2WI and DWI for reader 1 and from 82.4 to 86.3% for reader 2. For the appendix, the cut-off ADC values that diagnosed appendicitis were 1.41 × 10 −3 and 1.26 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s with accuracies of 78.4% and 76.5%, respectively. For the peri-appendiceal tissue, these values of 1.03 × 10 −3 and 0.91 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s differentiated between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis with an accuracy of 97.1%. Conclusions Combined DWI and T2WI provided high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. The inflamed appendix had lower ADC value than the normal appendix. The peri-appendiceal tissue presenting low ADC value was a notable finding of complicated appendicitis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2366-004X
2366-0058
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-02180-3