Predicting diabetic kidney disease for type 2 diabetes mellitus by machine learning in the real world: a multicenter retrospective study

• Published in: Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Vol. 14; p. 1184190
• Main Authors: Liu, Xiao Zhu, Duan, Minjie, Huang, Hao Dong, Zhang, Yang, Xiang, Tian Yu, Niu, Wu Ceng, Zhou, Bei, Wang, Hao Lin, Zhang, Ting Ting
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 04.07.2023
• Subjects: Albumins; Bayes Theorem; CatBoost model; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis; diabetic kidney disease; Diabetic Nephropathies - diagnosis; Diabetic Nephropathies - etiology; Endocrinology; Humans; machine learning; prediction; Retrospective Studies; type 2 diabetes mellitus; diabetic kidney disease; prediction; type 2 diabetes mellitus; machine learning; CatBoost model
• ISSN: 1664-2392; 1664-2392
• DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1184190

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has been reported as a main microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus. Although renal biopsy is capable of distinguishing DKD from Non Diabetic kidney disease(NDKD), no gold standard has been validated to assess the development of DKD.This study aimed to build an auxiliary diagnosis model for type 2 Diabetic kidney disease (T2DKD) based on machine learning algorithms. Clinical data on 3624 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was gathered from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 using a multi-center retrospective database. The data fell into a training set and a validation set at random at a ratio of 8:2. To identify critical clinical variables, the absolute shrinkage and selection operator with the lowest number was employed. Fifteen machine learning models were built to support the diagnosis of T2DKD, and the optimal model was selected in accordance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. The model was improved with the use of Bayesian Optimization methods. The Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) approach was used to illustrate prediction findings. DKD was diagnosed in 1856 (51.2 percent) of the 3624 individuals within the final cohort. As revealed by the SHAP findings, the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model achieved the optimal performance 1in the prediction of the risk of T2DKD, with an AUC of 0.86 based on the top 38 characteristics. The SHAP findings suggested that a simplified CatBoost model with an AUC of 0.84 was built in accordance with the top 12 characteristics. The more basic model features consisted of systolic blood pressure (SBP), creatinine (CREA), length of stay (LOS), thrombin time (TT), Age, prothrombin time (PT), platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR), albumin (ALB), glucose (GLU), fibrinogen (FIB-C), red blood cell distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD), as well as hemoglobin A1C(HbA1C). A machine learning-based model for the prediction of the risk of developing T2DKD was built, and its effectiveness was verified. The CatBoost model can contribute to the diagnosis of T2DKD. Clinicians could gain more insights into the outcomes if the ML model is made interpretable.