Changes in the composition of hunting catches in southeastern Cameroon a promising approach for collaborative wildlife management between ecologists and local hunters

• Published in: Ecology and society Vol. 20; no. 4; p. 25
• Main Authors: Yasuoka, Hirokazu, Hirai, Masaaki, Kamgaing, Towa O. W., Dzefack, Zeun's C. B., Kamdoum, Eric Chrétien, Bobo, Kadiri S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Resilience Alliance 01.01.2015
• Subjects: Animals; Baka Pygmy; Bantu farmer; blue duiker ( Philantomba monticola ); catch B/M; Cephalophus; Conservation biology; Elephant hunting; Forest conservation; Forest ecology; Human ecology; Hunter gatherers; Hunting; medium-sized duiker ( Cephalophus spp.); Tropical rain forests; Wildlife management
• ISSN: 1708-3087; 1708-3087
• DOI: 10.5751/es-08041-200425

In recent years, both depletion of wild animals and declining food supply have threatened the livelihoods of people inhabiting the forests of the Congo Basin, and rendered the bushmeat trade a national and global concern. Because initial approaches to wildlife management were criticized for lacking consideration of the customary rights of local people, a variety of projects have been proposed to ensure their active participation in management initiatives. However, unfamiliar with the concepts of conservation ecology, local people have found it difficult to contribute effectively. This paper proposes an approach to monitor the status of fauna, based on the ratio of blue duikers (Philantomba monticola) to medium-sized duikers (Cephalophusspp.) for the total number of hunting catches (the catch B/M). Analysis of changes in the composition of hunting catches across multiple sites in southeastern Cameroon revealed the following trends: (1) without substantive human intervention, i.e., hunting pressure and forest disturbance, medium-sized duikers were densely distributed while blue duikers were sparse, so that the catch B/M was low; (2) under moderate human intervention, blue duikers became more densely distributed while the original density of medium-sized duikers was maintained, so that the catch B/M increased; (3) with extensive human intervention in specific areas, medium-sized duikers became sparsely distributed while a relatively high density of blue duikers was maintained, so that the catch B/M increased significantly and a mosaic of different compositions of duikers was formed; and (4) with extensive human intervention extending over the specific extensive area, both medium-sized and blue duikers became sparse. It appears that the catch B/M predicts changes in the status of game animals and of the background wild fauna, and is both a sufficiently reliable variable for ecologists and perceptible for local people. Furthermore, this approach has the potential to cultivate a relationship of trust between ecologists and local people, which is indispensable in establishing effective collaborative wildlife management.