Refolding of Lysozyme in Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography: Effects of Hydrophobicity of Adsorbent and Salt Concentration in Mobile Phase

The effects of salt concentration in mobile phase, elution strategy, and hydrophobicity of stationary phase on lysozyme refolding in hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) were investigated. Butyl Sepharose 4 Fast Flow, the least hydrophobic HIC resin among the tested adsorbent, showed the bes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotechnology and bioprocess engineering Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 213 - 219
Main Authors Hwang, S.M., Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea, Kang, H.J., Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea, Bae, S.W., Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea, Chang, W.J., Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea, Koo, Y.M., Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg The Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering 01.04.2010
Springer Nature B.V
한국생물공학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effects of salt concentration in mobile phase, elution strategy, and hydrophobicity of stationary phase on lysozyme refolding in hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) were investigated. Butyl Sepharose 4 Fast Flow, the least hydrophobic HIC resin among the tested adsorbent, showed the best refolding yield. The binding efficiency of unfolded lysozyme on the adsorbent was maximized when 1 and 0.4 M of initial and final concentration of ammonium sulfate was used in mobile phase, respectively. The optimum gradient strategy for refolding and elution of lysozyme was determined as linear increase of urea concentration to 4 M. The optimized condition suggests the less hydrophobic environment than conventionally used salt solutions and HIC resins. Consequently, total refolding yield was improved 1.6 times comparing with optimized dilution-based batch refolding method.
Bibliography:E21
2011000666
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-000785.2010.15.2.021
ISSN:1226-8372
1976-3816
DOI:10.1007/s12257-009-0216-7