Long-term renal outcomes comparison between patients with chronic kidney disease and hepatorenal syndrome after living donor liver transplantation

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a disastrous renal complication of advanced liver disease with a poor prognosis. Restoring normal liver function through liver transplantation (LT) is a standardized treatment with favorable short-term survival. However, the long-term renal outcomes in patients with HRS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in surgery Vol. 10; p. 1116728
Main Authors Tseng, Hsiang-Yu, Lin, Yu-Hung, Lin, Chih-Che, Chen, Chao-Long, Yong, Chee-Chien, Lin, Li-Man, Wang, Chih-Chi, Chan, Yi-Chia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 03.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a disastrous renal complication of advanced liver disease with a poor prognosis. Restoring normal liver function through liver transplantation (LT) is a standardized treatment with favorable short-term survival. However, the long-term renal outcomes in patients with HRS receiving living donor LT (LDLT) are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of LDLT in patients with HRS. We reviewed adult patients who underwent LDLT between July 2008 and September 2017. Recipients were classified into 1) HRS type 1 (HRS1,  = 11), 2) HRS type 2 (HRS2,  = 19), 3) non-HRS recipients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD,  = 43), and 4) matched normal renal function (  = 67). Postoperative complications and 30-day surgical mortality were comparable among the HRS1, HRS2, CKD, and normal renal function groups. The 5-year survival rate was >90% and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) transiently improved and peaked at 4 weeks post-transplantation in patients with HRS. However, renal function deteriorated and resulted in CKD stage ≥ III in 72.7% of HRS1 and 78.9% of HRS2 patients (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m ). The incidence of developing CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was similar between the HRS1, HRS2, and CKD groups, but significantly higher than that in the normal renal function group (both  < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, pre-LDLT eGFR <46.4 ml/min/1.73 m predicted the development of post-LDLT CKD stage ≥ III in patients with HRS (AUC = 0.807, 95% CI = 0.617-0.997,  = 0.011). LDLT provides a significant survival benefit for patients with HRS. However, the risk of CKD stage ≥ III and ESRD among patients with HRS was similar to that in pre-transplant CKD recipients. An early preventative renal-sparing strategy in patients with HRS is recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Shang Yu Wang, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
Reviewed by: Michael Kueht, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States Antonio Siniscalchi, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Italy
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1116728