3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 17; no. 6; p. 1336
• Main Authors: Banna, Muinul, Bera, Kaustav, Sochol, Ryan, Lin, Liwei, Najjaran, Homayoun, Sadiq, Rehan, Hoorfar, Mina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 08.06.2017; MDPI
• Subjects: 3-D printers; 3D-Printing; Computational fluid dynamics; Drinking water; Environmental monitoring; Equilibrium flow; Extrusion; Fused deposition modeling; Low conductivity; Low pressure; miniaturized sensors; On-line systems; online monitoring; Pressure; Sensors; Stress concentration; Two dimensional models; Water distribution; Water engineering; Water quality; Water supply systems; miniaturized sensors; water quality; online monitoring; 3D-Printing
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s17061336

The online and accurate monitoring of drinking water supply networks is critically in demand to rapidly detect the accidental or deliberate contamination of drinking water. At present, miniaturized water quality monitoring sensors developed in the laboratories are usually tested under ambient pressure and steady-state flow conditions; however, in Water Distribution Systems (WDS), both the pressure and the flowrate fluctuate. In this paper, an interface is designed and fabricated using additive manufacturing or 3D printing technology-material extrusion (Trade Name: fused deposition modeling, FDM) and material jetting-to provide a conduit for miniaturized sensors for continuous online water quality monitoring. The interface is designed to meet two main criteria: low pressure at the inlet of the sensors and a low flowrate to minimize the water bled (i.e., leakage), despite varying pressure from WDS. To meet the above criteria, a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model was used to optimize the geometry of the channel. The 3D printed interface, with the embedded miniaturized pH and conductivity sensors, was then tested at different temperatures and flowrates. The results show that the response of the pH sensor is independent of the flowrate and temperature. As for the conductivity sensor, the flowrate and temperature affect only the readings at a very low conductivity (4 µS/cm) and high flowrates (30 mL/min), and a very high conductivity (460 µS/cm), respectively.