Insights in the host response towards biomaterial-based scaffolds for cancer therapy

Immunotherapeutic strategies have shown promising results in the treatment of cancer. However, not all patients respond, and treatments can have severe side-effects. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy across different leukaemia and lymphoma types. But the treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology Vol. 11; p. 1149943
Main Authors Schluck, Marjolein, Weiden, Jorieke, Verdoes, Martijn, Figdor, Carl G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 05.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Immunotherapeutic strategies have shown promising results in the treatment of cancer. However, not all patients respond, and treatments can have severe side-effects. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy across different leukaemia and lymphoma types. But the treatment of solid tumours remains a challenge due to limited persistence and tumour infiltration. We believe that biomaterial-based scaffolds are promising new tools and may address several of the challenges associated with cancer vaccination and ACT. In particular, biomaterial-based scaffold implants allow for controlled delivery of activating signals and/or functional T cells at specific sites. One of the main challenges for their application forms the host response against these scaffolds, which includes unwanted myeloid cell infiltration and the formation of a fibrotic capsule around the scaffold, thereby limiting cell traffic. In this review we provide an overview of several of the biomaterial-based scaffolds designed for cancer therapy to date. We will discuss the host responses observed and we will highlight design parameters that influence this response and their potential impact on therapeutic outcome.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Yongsheng Y. U., Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Edited by: Lan Xiao, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Reviewed by: Kyung-Ho Roh, University of Alabama in Huntsville, United States
ISSN:2296-4185
2296-4185
DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1149943