Forced Friends: Why the Free Energy Principle Is Not the New Hamilton’s Principle

The claim that the free energy principle is somehow related to Hamilton’s principle in statistical mechanics is ubiquitous throughout the subject literature. However, the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. According to some sources, the free energy principle is merely similar to Hami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 26; no. 9; p. 797
Main Authors Radomski, Bartosz Michał, Dołęga, Krzysztof
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 18.09.2024
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The claim that the free energy principle is somehow related to Hamilton’s principle in statistical mechanics is ubiquitous throughout the subject literature. However, the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. According to some sources, the free energy principle is merely similar to Hamilton’s principle of stationary action; others claim that it is either analogous or equivalent to it, while yet another part of the literature espouses the claim that it is a version of Hamilton’s principle. In this article, we aim to clarify the nature of the relationship between the two principles by investigating the two most likely interpretations of the claims that can be found in the subject literature. According to the strong interpretation, the two principles are equivalent and apply to the same subset of physical phenomena; according to the weak interpretation, the two principles are merely analogous to each other by virtue of their similar formal structures. As we show, adopting the stronger reading would lead to a dilemma that is untenable for the proponents of the free energy principle, thus supporting the adoption of the weaker reading for the relationship between the two constructs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1099-4300
1099-4300
DOI:10.3390/e26090797