Inferring influence of people's emotions at court on defendant's emotions using a prediction model

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 14; p. 1131724
• Main Authors: Song, Yun, Zhao, Tianyi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06.03.2023
• Subjects: AI in law; deep learning; emotion at court; emotion prediction; judgement; Psychology; deep learning; judgement; emotion prediction; AI in law; emotion at court
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131724

People's emotions may be affected by the sound environment in court. A courtroom's sound environment usually consists of the people's voices, such as the judge's voice, the plaintiff's voice, and the defendant's voice. The judge, plaintiff, and defendant usually express their emotions through their voices. Human communication is heavily reliant on emotions. Emotions may also reflect a person's condition. Therefore, People's emotions at the Court must be recognized, especially for vulnerable groups, and the impact of the sound on the defendant's motions and judgment must be inferred. However, people's emotions are difficult to recognize in a courtroom. In addition, as far as we know, no existing study deals with the impact of sound on people in court. Based on sound perception, we develop a deep neural network-based model to infer people's emotions in our previous work. In the proposed model, we use the convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network to obtain features from speech signals and apply a dense neural network to infer people's emotions. Applying the model for emotion prediction based on sound at court, we explore the impact of sound at court on the defendant. Using the voice data collected from fifty trail records, we demonstrate that the voice of the judge can affect the defendant's emotions. Angry, neutrality and fear are the top three emotions of the defendant in court. In particular, the judge's voice expressing anger usually induces fear in the defendant. The plaintiff's angry voice may not have a substantial impact on the defendant's emotions.