Comparative effects of estrogen and antiestrogens on differentiation of osteoblasts in mouse bone marrow culture

Estrogens as well as some antiestrogens have been shown to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women. These compounds seem to inhibit bone resorption, but their anabolic effects have been less explored. In this study, bone marrow cultures were used to compare the effect of 17β‐estradiol (E2), and tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cellular biochemistry Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 500 - 507
Main Authors Qu, Qiang, Härkönen, Pirkko L., Väänänen, H. Kalervo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15.06.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Estrogens as well as some antiestrogens have been shown to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women. These compounds seem to inhibit bone resorption, but their anabolic effects have been less explored. In this study, bone marrow cultures were used to compare the effect of 17β‐estradiol (E2), and two triphenylethylene derivatives, tamoxifen (TAM), and FC1271a, and a benzothiophene derivative raloxifene (RAL) on differentiation of osteoblasts. All enhanced osteoblastic differentiation of 21‐day cultures as indicated by increased mineralization and bone nodule formation. All, except RAL, stimulated cell proliferation during the first 6 days of the culture. However, in the presence of RAL the content of total protein was increased in 13‐day cultures. SDS‐PAGE and autoradiography of [14C]‐proline labeled proteins revealed elevated level of the newly synthesized collagen type I. The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 abolished the increase of the specific activity of alkaline phosphatase by E2, TAM, and FC1271a but not the effect of RAL on protein synthesis. Our results show that E2 as well as TAM, FC1271a, and RAL stimulate bone formation in vitro but the mechanism of the anabolic action of RAL in bone clearly differs from that of E2, TAM, and FC1271a. J. Cell. Biochem. 73:500–507, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-SLGZ129Q-2
istex:8337B062DA2F1C98164BDB869978270570D6AF33
ArticleID:JCB8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0730-2312
1097-4644
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990615)73:4<500::AID-JCB8>3.0.CO;2-E