High‐energy water sites determine peptide binding affinity and specificity of PDZ domains

PDZ domains have well known binding preferences for distinct C‐terminal peptide motifs. For most PDZ domains, these motifs are of the form [S/T]‐W‐[I/L/V]. Although the preference for S/T has been explained by a specific hydrogen bond interaction with a histidine in the PDZ domain and the (I/L/V) is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProtein science Vol. 18; no. 8; pp. 1609 - 1619
Main Authors Beuming, Thijs, Farid, Ramy, Sherman, Woody
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.08.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PDZ domains have well known binding preferences for distinct C‐terminal peptide motifs. For most PDZ domains, these motifs are of the form [S/T]‐W‐[I/L/V]. Although the preference for S/T has been explained by a specific hydrogen bond interaction with a histidine in the PDZ domain and the (I/L/V) is buried in a hydrophobic pocket, the mechanism for Trp specificity at the second to last position has thus far remained unknown. Here, we apply a method to compute the free energies of explicit water molecules and predict that potency gained by Trp binding is due to a favorable release of high‐energy water molecules into bulk. The affinities of a series of peptides for both wild‐type and mutant forms of the PDZ domain of Erbin correlate very well with the computed free energy of binding of displaced waters, suggesting a direct relationship between water displacement and peptide affinity. Finally, we show a correlation between the magnitude of the displaced water free energy and the degree of Trp‐sensitivity among subtypes of the HTRA PDZ family, indicating a water‐mediated mechanism for specificity of peptide binding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1002/pro.177