Collective Bargaining and Faculty Job Satisfaction
Estimates of the impact of union membership on job satisfaction suffer from nonrandom self‐selection of employees into unions. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by examining the impact on satisfaction of collective bargaining representation, rather than of union membership. We use a two‐stag...
Saved in:
Published in | Industrial relations (Berkeley) Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 619 - 644 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berkeley
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Estimates of the impact of union membership on job satisfaction suffer from nonrandom self‐selection of employees into unions. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by examining the impact on satisfaction of collective bargaining representation, rather than of union membership. We use a two‐stage technique that controls for nonrandom selection of faculty into institutions, and apply that to a panel of faculty at repeatedly observed four‐year universities. We find that bargaining agreements increase satisfaction with compensation but reduce satisfaction with faculty workload. Bargaining has no statistically measurable impact on overall job satisfaction or on faculty's satisfaction with their authority to make decisions regarding their instructional duties. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IREL12027 istex:701F6D69C1CD647E4E55C97FB994DBE2495691C7 ark:/67375/WNG-CT72CH61-T ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0019-8676 1468-232X |
DOI: | 10.1111/irel.12027 |