Collective Bargaining and Faculty Job Satisfaction

Estimates of the impact of union membership on job satisfaction suffer from nonrandom self‐selection of employees into unions. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by examining the impact on satisfaction of collective bargaining representation, rather than of union membership. We use a two‐stag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndustrial relations (Berkeley) Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 619 - 644
Main Authors Krieg, John M., Wassell Jr, Charles S., Hedrick, David W., Henson, Steven E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berkeley Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Estimates of the impact of union membership on job satisfaction suffer from nonrandom self‐selection of employees into unions. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by examining the impact on satisfaction of collective bargaining representation, rather than of union membership. We use a two‐stage technique that controls for nonrandom selection of faculty into institutions, and apply that to a panel of faculty at repeatedly observed four‐year universities. We find that bargaining agreements increase satisfaction with compensation but reduce satisfaction with faculty workload. Bargaining has no statistically measurable impact on overall job satisfaction or on faculty's satisfaction with their authority to make decisions regarding their instructional duties.
Bibliography:ArticleID:IREL12027
istex:701F6D69C1CD647E4E55C97FB994DBE2495691C7
ark:/67375/WNG-CT72CH61-T
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0019-8676
1468-232X
DOI:10.1111/irel.12027