Productive and Spatial Strategies in the Montreal Tobacco Industry, 1850-1918

This paper explores the productive and spatial strategies associated with industrial change. A significant portion of the literature on industrial change after 1880 has emphasized the importance of the corporation. To add another dimension to this literature, and building on the work of economic geo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomic geography Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 370 - 389
Main Author Lewis, Robert D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Worcester, MA Routledge 01.10.1994
Clark University
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper explores the productive and spatial strategies associated with industrial change. A significant portion of the literature on industrial change after 1880 has emphasized the importance of the corporation. To add another dimension to this literature, and building on the work of economic geographers and historians, this paper investigates the range of strategies open to firms and industries. These strategies are theorized through the concept of production formats, which states that studies of industrial organization and economic change need to be built upon the social, technological, and material properties of firms and industries within a historically specific context, and are demonstrated through the example of the Montreal tobacco industry between 1850 and 1918. The production format is a useful concept for understanding the divergent growth paths of the various branches of the tobacco industry, as it is able to capture a variety of productive and spatial strategies characterizing the industry after 1850. From as early as the 1870s the industry was broken into a number of segments, each pursuing different industrial practices and each employing urban space to suit these practices. The dramatic growth of the large-scale, capital-intensive tobacco firm after 1880, which was built upon earlier trends, did not mean a reduction in the variety of production formats in the industry. The period up to 1918 was defined by the coexistence of different industrial and spatial strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-0095
1944-8287
DOI:10.2307/143729