Using the Revised Cardiac Risk Index to Predict Major Postoperative Events for People With Kidney Failure: An External Validation and Update

People with kidney failure have high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) is used to estimate the risk of major postoperative events, it has not been validated in this population. We aimed to externally validate the RCRI and determine whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCJC open (Online) Vol. 4; no. 10; pp. 905 - 912
Main Authors Harrison, Tyrone G, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R, James, Matthew T, Sawhney, Simon, Lam, Ngan N, Ruzycki, Shannon M, Wilson, Todd A, Ronksley, Paul E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier 01.10.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:People with kidney failure have high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) is used to estimate the risk of major postoperative events, it has not been validated in this population. We aimed to externally validate the RCRI and determine whether updating the model improved predictions for people with kidney failure. We derived a retrospective, population-based cohort of adults with kidney failure (maintenance dialysis or sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m ) who had surgery in Alberta, Canada between 2005 and 2019. We categorized participants based on RCRI variables and assigned risk estimates of death or major cardiac events, and then estimated predictive performance. We re-estimated the coefficients for each RCRI variable and internally validated the updated model. Net benefit was estimated with decision curve analysis. After 38,541 surgeries, 1204 events (3.1%) occurred. The estimated C-statistic for the original RCRI was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.65). Examination of calibration revealed significant risk overestimation. In the re-estimated RCRI model, discrimination was marginally different (C-statistic 0.67 [95% confidence interval: 0.66, 0.69]), though calibration was improved. No net benefit was observed when the data were examined with decision curve analysis, whereas the original RCRI was associated with harm. The RCRI performed poorly in a Canadian kidney failure cohort and significantly overestimated risk, suggesting that RCRI use in similar kidney failure populations should be limited. A re-estimated kidney failure-specific RCRI may be promising but needs external validation. Novel perioperative models for this population are urgently needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2589-790X
2589-790X
DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.07.008