Stroke registry: hemorrhagic vs ischemic strokes

Abstract Background Epidemiologic studies of stroke in the 1970s and 1980s have reported the percentage of ischemic stroke as 73% to 86%, with hemorrhagic stroke as only 8% to 18%; the remainder was undetermined (due to not performing computed tomographic [CT] scanning or an autopsy). In our clinica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 331 - 333
Main Authors Shiber, Joseph R., MD, Fontane, Emily, MD, Adewale, Ademola, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.03.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Epidemiologic studies of stroke in the 1970s and 1980s have reported the percentage of ischemic stroke as 73% to 86%, with hemorrhagic stroke as only 8% to 18%; the remainder was undetermined (due to not performing computed tomographic [CT] scanning or an autopsy). In our clinical work, it appeared anecdotally to the authors that we were seeing more hemorrhagic strokes than these previously quoted figures. Methods We conducted a retrospective review for 1 year of all patients discharged from the hospital, a regional stroke center, with a diagnosis of stroke; we compared ischemic to hemorrhagic stroke types. Results There were 757 patients included. Of the patients, 41.9% were hemorrhagic and 58.1% were ischemic. Conclusion There were a much greater percentage of hemorrhagic strokes in this population than would have been predicted from previous studies. This finding may be due to improvement of CT scan availability and implementation unmasking a previous underestimation of the actual percentage or to an increase in therapeutic use of antiplatelet agents and warfarin causing an increase in the incidence of hemorrhage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.10.026