Non-thermal Plasma Suppresses Bacterial Colonization on Skin Wound and Promotes Wound Healing in Mice

The present study evaluated the effect of non-thermal plasma on skin wound healing in BalB/c mice.Two 6-mm wounds along the both sides of the spine were created on the back of each mouse(n=80) by using a punch biopsy.The mice were assigned randomly into two groups,with 40 animals in each group:a non...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 390 - 394
Main Author 俞莺 谭明 陈宏翔 吴志洪 许莉 李娟 曹经江 杨寅生 肖学敏 连昕 卢新培 涂亚庭
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Huazhong University of Science and Technology 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present study evaluated the effect of non-thermal plasma on skin wound healing in BalB/c mice.Two 6-mm wounds along the both sides of the spine were created on the back of each mouse(n=80) by using a punch biopsy.The mice were assigned randomly into two groups,with 40 animals in each group:a non-thermal plasma group in which the mice were treated with the non-thermal plasma;a control group in which the mice were left to heal naturally.Wound healing was evaluated on postoperative days(POD) 4,7,10 and 14(n=5 per group in each POD) by percentage of wound closure.The mice was euthanized on POD 1,4,7,10,14,21,28 and 35(n=1 in each POD).The wounds were removed,routinely fixed,paraffin-embedded,sectioned and HE-stained.A modified scoring system was used to evaluate the wounds.The results showed that acute inflammation peaked on POD 4 in non-thermal plasma group,earlier than in control group in which acute inflammation reached a peak on POD 7,and the acute inflammation scores were much lower in non-thermal group than in control group on POD 7(P0.05).The amount of granular tissue was greater on POD 4 and 7 in non-thermal group than in control group(P0.05).The re-epithelialization score and the neovasularization score were increased significantly in non-thermal group when compared with control group on POD 7 and 10(P0.05 for all).The count of bacterial colonies was 103 CFU/mL on POD 4 and 20 CFU/mL on POD 7,significantly lower than that in control group(109 CFU/mL on POD 4 and 1012 CFU/mL on the POD 7)(P0.05).It was suggested that the non-thermal plasma facilitates the wound healing by suppressing bacterial colo-nization.
Bibliography:Ying YU1,Ming TAN2,Hongxiang CHEN1,Zhihong WU1,Li XU1,Juan LI1,Jingjiang CAO1,Yinsheng YANG1,Xuemin XIAO1,Xin LIAN1,Xinpei LU3,Yating TU1# 1Department of Dermatology,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China 2Department of Cosmetology,Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430022,China 3College of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China
42-1679/R
The present study evaluated the effect of non-thermal plasma on skin wound healing in BalB/c mice.Two 6-mm wounds along the both sides of the spine were created on the back of each mouse(n=80) by using a punch biopsy.The mice were assigned randomly into two groups,with 40 animals in each group:a non-thermal plasma group in which the mice were treated with the non-thermal plasma;a control group in which the mice were left to heal naturally.Wound healing was evaluated on postoperative days(POD) 4,7,10 and 14(n=5 per group in each POD) by percentage of wound closure.The mice was euthanized on POD 1,4,7,10,14,21,28 and 35(n=1 in each POD).The wounds were removed,routinely fixed,paraffin-embedded,sectioned and HE-stained.A modified scoring system was used to evaluate the wounds.The results showed that acute inflammation peaked on POD 4 in non-thermal plasma group,earlier than in control group in which acute inflammation reached a peak on POD 7,and the acute inflammation scores were much lower in non-thermal group than in control group on POD 7(P0.05).The amount of granular tissue was greater on POD 4 and 7 in non-thermal group than in control group(P0.05).The re-epithelialization score and the neovasularization score were increased significantly in non-thermal group when compared with control group on POD 7 and 10(P0.05 for all).The count of bacterial colonies was 103 CFU/mL on POD 4 and 20 CFU/mL on POD 7,significantly lower than that in control group(109 CFU/mL on POD 4 and 1012 CFU/mL on the POD 7)(P0.05).It was suggested that the non-thermal plasma facilitates the wound healing by suppressing bacterial colo-nization.
non-thermal plasma; wound healing; BalB/c mice; bacterial colonization
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1672-0733
1993-1352
DOI:10.1007/s11596-011-0387-2