Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm and Survival in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation

Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of sinus rhythm and outcomes in patients with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Background The value of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with AF and heart failure (HF)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 55; no. 17; pp. 1796 - 1802
Main Authors Talajic, Mario, MD, Khairy, Paul, MD, PhD, Levesque, Sylvie, MSc, Connolly, Stuart J., MD, Dorian, Paul, MD, Dubuc, Marc, MD, Guerra, Peter G., MD, Hohnloser, Stefan H., MD, Lee, Kerry L., PhD, Macle, Laurent, MD, Nattel, Stanley, MD, Pedersen, Ole D., MD, Stevenson, Lynne Warner, MD, Thibault, Bernard, MD, Waldo, Albert L., MD, Wyse, D. George, MD, PhD, Roy, Denis, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 27.04.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of sinus rhythm and outcomes in patients with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Background The value of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with AF and heart failure (HF) is uncertain. Methods A total of 1,376 patients with AF, ejection fraction ≤35%, and heart failure symptoms were randomized to a rhythm- or rate-control strategy. Detailed efficacy analyses were used to evaluate the independent effects of treatment strategy and the presence of sinus rhythm on cardiovascular outcomes. Results Overall, 445 (32%) patients died and 402 (29%) experienced worsening HF. The rhythm-control strategy was not predictive of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 1.16; p = 0.41), all-cause death (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.08; p = 0.19), or worsening HF (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.10; p = 0.23). In analyses devised to isolate the effect of underlying rhythm, sinus rhythm was not associated with cardiovascular mortality [HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.87; p = 0.35), total mortality [HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.58; p = 0.57), or worsening HF [HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.02; p = 0.059). Conclusions A rhythm-control strategy or the presence of sinus rhythm are not associated with better outcomes in patients with AF and CHF.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.023