Psychometric evaluation of the academic involution scale for college students in China: An application of Rasch analysis
Recent academic attention on educational involution in China underpins the need for a valid and reliable instrument to precisely measure college students’ academic involution behaviors. Seeing the scarcity of a proper instrument, the current study attempted to analyze the item-level psychometric pro...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 14; p. 1135658 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
21.02.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Recent academic attention on educational involution in China underpins the need for a valid and reliable instrument to precisely measure college students’ academic involution behaviors. Seeing the scarcity of a proper instrument, the current study attempted to analyze the item-level psychometric properties of the newly developed Academic Involution Scale for College Students (AISCS) in China by using a Rasch model. A total of 637 college students in a public university in northern China participated in the study. Data were examined with respect to unidimensionality, rating scale functioning, item fit statistics, item polarity, item- and person-level reliability and separation, item hierarchy and invariance across educational background with Winsteps. The results show that AISCS was a single unidimensional construct with good psychometric properties. Although two items demonstrated differential item functioning, it is plausible given the differences between assessment methods for undergraduates and postgraduates. Limitations and future research directions with regard to sample selection, inclusion of more validity evidence and adding prospective additional academic involution were discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Edited by: Marie Oger, Université de Lorraine, France Reviewed by: Yi-Hsin Chen, University of South Florida, United States; Rudolf Debelak, University of Zurich, Switzerland |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135658 |