Does believing in different types of religion affect subjective wellbeing? Analysis of the public data of the Taiwan Social Change Survey

Previous studies have revealed the impact of objective material conditions and psychological factors, such as the influence of religion on subjective well-being, but have disregarded the role played by differences of religious types formed in Asian cultural and historical contexts. Against this back...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 1054566
Main Authors Ding, Yu, Huo, Weidong, Jin, Yaning
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies have revealed the impact of objective material conditions and psychological factors, such as the influence of religion on subjective well-being, but have disregarded the role played by differences of religious types formed in Asian cultural and historical contexts. Against this background, the present study aims to examine the association between religious type and subjective wellbeing and its mechanisms – the mediating role of frequency of religious activity and the moderating role of urban-rural areas. This study used Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS) 2018 data for researching. The results show that the discrepancy in the frequency of participation in religious activity caused by different types of religious belief will influence personal wellbeing. Respondents who adhere to institutional religion have a higher frequency of participating in religious activities, which has a positive impact on subjective wellbeing. Moreover, further examination shows that urban–rural areas play an important moderating role: respondents living in urban areas are more inclined to participate in religious activities frequently to gain a sense of wellbeing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: John Elvis Hagan, Bielefeld University, Germany
Reviewed by: Lluis Oviedo, Pontifical University Antonianum, Italy; Li He, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, China; Xinshan Jia, South China Agricultural University, China
This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054566