Investigating the Impact of Different Suspicion of Infection Criteria on the Accuracy of Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores

• Published in: Critical care medicine Vol. 45; no. 11; p. 1805
• Main Authors: Churpek, Matthew M, Snyder, Ashley, Sokol, Sarah, Pettit, Natasha N, Edelson, Dana P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.11.2017
• Subjects: Academic Medical Centers; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage; Bacteriological Techniques; Blood Culture; Cohort Studies; Early Diagnosis; Female; Heart Arrest - mortality; Humans; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data; Male; Middle Aged; Organ Dysfunction Scores; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; ROC Curve; Sepsis - diagnosis; Sepsis - drug therapy; Sepsis - mortality; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - diagnosis; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - drug therapy; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - mortality
• ISSN: 1530-0293
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002648

Studies in sepsis are limited by heterogeneity regarding what constitutes suspicion of infection. We sought to compare potential suspicion criteria using antibiotic and culture order combinations in terms of patient characteristics and outcomes. We further sought to determine the impact of differing criteria on the accuracy of sepsis screening tools and early warning scores. Observational cohort study. Academic center from November 2008 to January 2016. Hospitalized patients outside the ICU. None. Six criteria were investigated: 1) any culture, 2) blood culture, 3) any culture plus IV antibiotics, 4) blood culture plus IV antibiotics, 5) any culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days, and 6) blood culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days. Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, the National and Modified Early Warning Score, and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score were calculated for predicting ICU transfer or death within 48 hours of meeting suspicion criteria. A total of 53,849 patients met at least one infection criteria. Mortality increased from 3% for group 1 to 9% for group 6 and percentage meeting Angus sepsis criteria increased from 20% to 40%. Across all criteria, score discrimination was lowest for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.60) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62), intermediate for quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65) and Modified Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67), and highest for National Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.71) and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73). The choice of criteria to define a potentially infected population significantly impacts prevalence of mortality but has little impact on accuracy. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was the least predictive and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage the most predictive regardless of how infection was defined.