Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members

The validity of the six‐question World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS) Screener was assessed in a sample of subscribers to a large health plan in the US. A convenience subsample of 668 subscribers was administered the ASRS Screener twice to assess test‐retest reliability and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 52 - 65
Main Authors Kessler, Ronald C., Adler, Lenard A., Gruber, Michael J., Sarawate, Chaitanya A., Spencer, Thomas, Van Brunt, David L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.06.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The validity of the six‐question World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS) Screener was assessed in a sample of subscribers to a large health plan in the US. A convenience subsample of 668 subscribers was administered the ASRS Screener twice to assess test‐retest reliability and then a third time in conjunction with a clinical interviewer for DSM‐IV adult ADHD. The data were weighted to adjust for discrepancies between the sample and the population on socio‐demographics and past medical claims. Internal consistency reliability of the continuous ASRS Screener was in the range 0.63–0.72 and test‐retest reliability (Pearson correlations) in the range 0.58–0.77. A four‐category version The ASRS Screener had strong concordance with clinician diagnoses, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90. The brevity and ability to discriminate DSM‐IV cases from non‐cases make the six‐question ASRS Screener attractive for use both in community epidemiological surveys and in clinical outreach and case‐finding initiatives. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:4A76A48DAE5EA7ABAB6949B8869E9F5F4F2F4CDD
ark:/67375/WNG-B1DJ9PML-G
ArticleID:MPR208
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1049-8931
1557-0657
DOI:10.1002/mpr.208