Hydrological connectivity of headwaters to downstream waters: introduction to the featured collection

The SWAATCC case presented the Court with two issues: (1) whether an isolated water could be considered part of the "waters of the United States," protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA) - and thus subject to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) regulatory authority under secti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Water Resources Association Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 1 - 4
Main Authors Nadeau, T.L, Rains, M.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The SWAATCC case presented the Court with two issues: (1) whether an isolated water could be considered part of the "waters of the United States," protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA) - and thus subject to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) regulatory authority under section 404 of the CWA - solely based on its use by migratory birds; and, if so, (2) whether Congress had the constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause to include these as waters of the United States. During that same time period, a significant majority of courts, including 17 appellate court decisions, concluded that SWANCC was narrowly focused on isolated waters, and did not change the jurisdictional status of tributaries or adjacent wetlands.
Bibliography:http://www.awra.org/jawra/index.html
istex:2F2A4E846F305BC3340199D42710EDD3FA42AF8D
ark:/67375/WNG-T19XDTM2-9
ArticleID:JAWR001
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1093-474X
1752-1688
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00001.x