Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement

• Published in: Expert review of medical devices Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 113 - 129
• Main Authors: Neugebauer, Jörg, Stachulla, Gerhard, Ritter, Lutz, Dreiseidler, Timo, Mischkowski, Robert A, Keeve, Erwin, Zöller, Joachim E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 01.01.2010; Expert Reviews Ltd; Informa Healthcare
• Subjects: 3D diagnosis; Animals; complication; Computer-Aided Design - instrumentation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; CT imaging; flapless procedure; guided implant placement; Health aspects; Humans; Implants, Artificial; navigation; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis; prosthetic-driven implant treatment; Software; Surgery; surgical guide; Technology application; virtual treatment plan; Germany
• ISSN: 1743-4440; 1745-2422
• DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.61

Implant treatment increasingly focuses on the reduction of treatment time and postoperative impairment. The improvement of 3D dental diagnosis by ConeBeam computed tomography allows detailed preparation for the surgical placement of dental implants under prosthetic considerations. While the first generation of implant planning software used high-contrast multislice computed tomography, software that has been specifically designed for ConeBeam computed tomography is now available. Implant placement can be performed using surgical guides or under the control of optical tracking systems. Surgical guides are more commonly used in private office owing to their availability. The accuracy for both techniques is clinically acceptable for achieving implant placement in critical anatomical indications. When using prefabricated superstructures and in flapless surgery, special abutments or an adjusted workflow are still necessary to compensate misfits of between 150 and 600 µm. The proposition to ensure proper implant placement by dentists with limited surgical experience through the use of surgical guides is unlikely to be successful, because there is also a specific learning curve for guided implant placement. Current and future development will continue to decrease the classical laboratory-technician work and will integrate the fabrication of superstructures with virtual treatment planning from the start.