Is there a correlation between obstructive sleep-apnea syndrome severity and prolidase activity as an oxidative stress marker?

• Published in: Nigerian journal of clinical practice Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 252 - 257
• Main Authors: Gunbatar, H, Kaplan, H, Yildiz, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.02.2020; Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Antioxidants - metabolism; Apnea; Arteries; Biomarkers - blood; Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging; Carotid Artery, Common - physiopathology; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Dipeptidases - blood; Female; Humans; Male; Medical research; Middle Aged; Oxidative stress; Oxidative Stress - physiology; Polysomnography; Sleep - physiology; Sleep apnea; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - blood; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - diagnosis; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - physiopathology; Sleep disorders; Snoring - diagnosis; Snoring - physiopathology; Australia; obstructive sleep apnea; prolidase; Carotid intima media
• ISSN: 1119-3077
• DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_18

Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a highly prevalent breathing disorder in sleep. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between OSAS and prolidase activity, the oxidative stress index (OSI), total antioxidative capacity (TAC), total oxidative capacity (TOC) and the carotid intima media thickness (CIMT). Method: After night polysomnography, 74 people were diagnosed with OSAS and simple snoring. Plasma prolidase activities, TAC and TOC were measured in blood samples taken in the morning after the sleep study. The patients' bilateral common carotid arteries were scanned. Results: In total, 56 patients were in OSAS group [13 subjects 23.2% mild, 19 subjects 33.9% moderate, 24 subjects 42.8% severe] and 18 in simple snoring control group. The mean Prolidase, TOC, TAC and OSI levels were 744.7 ± 156.8, 59.2 ± 19.2, 2.12 ± 0.41, 3.12 ± 1.03, in the mild OSAS group, 761.6 ± 114.4, 57.9 ± 18.3, 2.03 ± 0.37, 3.15 ± 0.8, in the moderate OSAS group, 754.08 ± 133.9, 51.15 ± 12.1, 1.97 ± 0.27, 2.8 ± 0.82, in the severe OSAS group, and 711.9 ± 139, 52.3 ± 15.1, 1.83 ± 0.32, 3.06 ± 0.92 in the control group, respectively. Mean CIMT measurements were 0.71(±0,13) in the OSAS group and 0.76(±0.07) in the control group. Conclusion: There was no difference between the control and OSAS groups in terms of the parameters studied. Further studies should be undertaken in order to clarify the relation.