Concentrations of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in biosolid amended soil, influent, effluent, receiving water, and sediment of wastewater treatment plants in Canada

• Published in: Chemosphere (Oxford) Vol. 93; no. 5; pp. 766 - 773
• Main Authors: Wang, De-Gao, Steer, Helena, Tait, Tara, Williams, Zackery, Pacepavicius, Grazina, Young, Teresa, Ng, Timothy, Smyth, Shirley Anne, Kinsman, Laura, Alaee, Mehran
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2013
• Subjects: Cyclic siloxanes; Effluent; effluents; Environmental Exposure; Fresh Water - chemistry; gas chromatography; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Geologic Sediments - chemistry; Influent; inhibitory concentration 50; mass spectrometry; monitoring; Quebec; Receiving water; risk; Sediment; sediments; Siloxanes - analysis; Soil; Soil - chemistry; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Waste Water - chemistry; wastewater; wastewater treatment; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Ontario; Quebec; Soil; Sediment; Influent; Receiving water; Cyclic siloxanes; Effluent
• ISSN: 0045-6535; 1879-1298
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.047

► Removal efficiencies of D4, D5, and D6 are above 90% in wastewater treatment plants in summer. ► D5 concentrations in effluent have an influence on those in receiving water. ► Potential risks of cVMS to aquatic, sediment-dwelling, and terrestrial organisms are low from the reported concentrations. A comprehensive surveillance program was conducted to determine the occurrence of three cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS) octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5), and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in environmental compartments impacted by wastewater effluent discharges. Eleven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), representative of those found in Southern Ontario and Southern Quebec, Canada, were investigated to determine levels of cVMS in their influents and effluents. In addition, receiving water and sediment impacted by WWTP effluents, and biosolid-amended soil from agricultural fields were also analyzed for a preliminary evaluation of the environmental exposure of cVMS in media impacted by wastewater effluent and solids. A newly-developed large volume injection (septumless head adapter and cooled injection system) gas chromatography – mass spectrometry method was used to avoid contamination originating from instrumental analysis. Concentrations of D4, D5, and D6 in influents to the 11 WWTPs were in the range 0.282–6.69μgL−1, 7.75–135μgL−1, and 1.53–26.9μgL−1, respectively. In general, wastewater treatment showed cVMS removal rates of greater than 92%, regardless of treatment type. The D4, D5, and D6 concentration ranges in effluent were <0.009–0.045μgL−1, <0.027–1.56μgL−1, and <0.022–0.093μgL−1, respectively. The concentrations in receiving water influenced by effluent, were lower compared to those in effluent in most cases, with the ranges <0.009–0.023μgL−1, <0.027–1.48μgL−1, and <0.022–0.151μgL−1 for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. Sediment concentrations ranged from <0.003–0.049μgg−1dw, 0.011–5.84μgg−1dw, and 0.004–0.371μgg−1dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. The concentrations in biosolid-amended soil, having values of <0.008–0.017μgg−1dw, <0.007–0.221μgg−1dw, and <0.009–0.711μgg−1dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively, were lower than those in sediment impacted by wastewater effluent in most cases. In comparison with the no-observed-effected concentrations (NOEC) and IC50 (concentration that causes 50% inhibition of the response) values, the potential risks to aquatic, sediment-dwelling, and terrestrial organisms from these reported concentrations are low.