The Effect of Freezing on Non-invasive Prenatal Testing

Plasma cryopreservation is unavoidable in China, due to technical specifications requiring storage of additional plasma at -80 degrees for three years. However, the effect of freezing on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is still uncertain. We collected 144 euploid pregnant samples, 22 on trisomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 6962
Main Authors Xie, Xiaolei, Li, Fuguang, Tan, Weihe, Yin, Weiguo, Chen, Feiyan, Guo, Xiaoyan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Nature Publishing Group 06.05.2019
Nature Publishing Group UK
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Plasma cryopreservation is unavoidable in China, due to technical specifications requiring storage of additional plasma at -80 degrees for three years. However, the effect of freezing on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is still uncertain. We collected 144 euploid pregnant samples, 22 on trisomy 21, 4 on trisomy 13, and 3 on trisomy 18, by massively parallel sequencing before and after freezing. Compared with the success rate of 100% of fresh samples, the detection success rates of trisomy 21, trisomy 13 and euploidy in frozen samples by NIPT were 95.45%, 75% and 95.14%, respectively. Of these, 9 cases of frozen sample sequencing failed, with 8 cases being due to high GC content. The chromosome 21 (chr21) z-value of the frozen trisomy 21 samples was lower than that of fresh samples. Meanwhile, freezing reduced the male positive foetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fraction, which was accompanied by an increase in the Unimap-GC level in the massively parallel sequencing data and a decrease in the Unique reads/Total reads ratio. Laboratory freezing reduced the chr21 z-value of foetal trisomy 21, which can be explained by a reduction in the foetal cfDNA fraction and effective Unique reads for NIPT analysis. The Unimap-GC content of the serum samples after freezing was higher, which can lead to failure of NIPT detection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-42980-7