Semantic Radicals Contribute to the Visual Identification of Chinese Characters

• Published in: Journal of memory and language Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 559 - 576
• Main Authors: Feldman, Laurie Beth, Siok, Witina W.T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01.05.1999; Elsevier; Academic Press; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Chinese languages; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Language; Production and perception of written language; Psychology; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; semantic component; semantic radical; semantic transparency; Semantics; sublexical component; semantic component; semantic transparency; semantic radical; sublexical component; Human; Semantic relation; Language; Priming effect; Vision; Phonetics; Chinese; Cognition; Verbal perception; Experimental study; Orthography; Recognition
• ISSN: 0749-596X; 1096-0821
• DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2629

In a character decision task, phonetic compound targets (composed of a semantic radical and a phonetic component) followed primes that shared (a) the target's radical and were semantically related (R+S+), (b) the target's radical and were not semantically related (R+S−), (c) no radical but were semantically related (R−S+), and (d) no radical and were not semantically related (R−S−). Target radicals also varied as to the number of compounds in which they appeared (i.e., combinability). When targets followed primes immediately (Experiment 1; SOA 243 ms), target latencies following R+S− primes were slowed relative to R−S− controls but those following R+S+ and R−S+ primes were facilitated equivalently. Increases in combinability significantly reduced decision latencies. When 10 items separated primes and targets (Experiment 2), facilitation was evident only after R+S+ primes. Results indicate that one type of component, the semantic radical, is processed in the course of Chinese character recognition and that orthographic similarity due to repetition of a radical is not an adequate account.