Human urine proteomics: building a list of human urine cancer biomarkers

In the last decade, several reports have focused on the identification and characterization of proteins present in urine. In an effort to build a list of proteins of interest as biomarkers, we reviewed the largest urine proteomes and built two updated lists of proteins of interest (available as supp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExpert review of proteomics Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. 347 - 360
Main Authors Casado-Vela, Juan, del Pulgar, Teresa Gómez, Cebrián, Arancha, Álvarez-Ayerza, Nestor, Lacal, Juan Carlos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.06.2011
Expert Reviews Ltd
Informa Healthcare
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the last decade, several reports have focused on the identification and characterization of proteins present in urine. In an effort to build a list of proteins of interest as biomarkers, we reviewed the largest urine proteomes and built two updated lists of proteins of interest (available as supplementary tables). The first table includes a consensus list of 443 proteins found in urine by independent laboratories and reported on the top three largest urine proteomes currently published. This consensus list of proteins could serve as biomarkers to diagnose, monitor and manage a number of diseases. Here, we focus on a reduced list of 35 proteins with potential interest as cancer biomarkers in urine following two criteria: first, proteins previously detected in urine using bottom-up proteomic experiments, and second, those suggested as cancer protein biomarkers in human plasma. In an effort to standardize the information presented and its use in future studies, here we include the updated International Protein Index (v. 3.80) and primary Swiss-Prot accession numbers, official gene symbols and recommended full names. The main variables that influence urine proteomic experiments are also discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1478-9450
1744-8387
DOI:10.1586/epr.11.26