The Value of Three-Dimensional Printing Spine Model in Severe Spine Deformity Correction Surgery

Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the value of 3-dimensional printing (3DP) spine model in the surgical treatment of severe spinal deformity since the prosperous development of 3DP technology. Methods: Severe scoliosis or hyper-kyphosis patients underwen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal spine journal Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 787 - 795
Main Authors Pan, Aixing, Ding, Hongtao, Hai, Yong, Liu, Yuzeng, Hai, Junrui Jonathan, Yin, Peng, Han, Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.04.2023
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the value of 3-dimensional printing (3DP) spine model in the surgical treatment of severe spinal deformity since the prosperous development of 3DP technology. Methods: Severe scoliosis or hyper-kyphosis patients underwent posterior fixation and fusion surgery using the 3DP spine models were reviewed (3DP group). Spinal deformity surgeries operated by free-hand screw implantation during the same period were selected as the control group after propensity score matching (PSM). The correction rate, pedicle screw accuracy, and complications were analyzed. Class A and B screws were defined as accurate according to Gertzbein and Robbins criteria. Results: 35 patients were enrolled in the 3DP group and 35 matched cases were included in the control group. The perioperative baseline data and deformity correction rate were similar between both groups (P > .05). However, the operation time and blood loss were significantly less in the 3DP group (296.14 ± 66.18 min vs. 329.43 ± 67.16 min, 711.43 ± 552.28 mL vs. 1322.29 ± 828.23 mL, P < .05). More three-column osteotomies (Grade 3-6) were performed in the 3DP group (30/35, 85.7% vs. 21/35, 60.0%. P = .016). The screw placement accuracy was significantly higher in the 3DP group (422/582, 72.51% vs. 397/575, 69.04%. P = .024). The screw misplacement related complication rate was significantly higher in the free-hand group (6/35 vs. 1/35, P = .046). Conclusions: The study provided solid evidence that 3DP spine models can enhance surgeons’ confidence in performing higher grade osteotomies and improve the safety and efficiency in severe spine deformity correction surgery. 3D printing technology has a good prospect in spinal deformity surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2192-5682
2192-5690
DOI:10.1177/21925682211008830