Driven by Mutations: The Predictive Value of Mutation Subtype in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

EGFR-mutated NSCLC is a genetically heterogeneous disease that includes more than 200 distinct mutations. The implications of mutational subtype for both prognostic and predictive value are being increasingly understood. Although the most common EGFR mutations—exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations—pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thoracic oncology Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 612 - 623
Main Authors Castellanos, Emily, Feld, Emily, Horn, Leora
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2017
Copyright by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1556-0864
1556-1380
1556-1380
DOI10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.014

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:EGFR-mutated NSCLC is a genetically heterogeneous disease that includes more than 200 distinct mutations. The implications of mutational subtype for both prognostic and predictive value are being increasingly understood. Although the most common EGFR mutations—exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations—predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), it is now being recognized that outcomes may be improved in patients with exon 19 deletions. Additionally, 10% of patients will have an uncommon EGFR mutation, and response to EGFR TKI therapy is highly variable depending on the mutation. Given the growing recognition of the genetic and clinical variation seen in this disease, the development of comprehensive bioinformatics-driven tools to both analyze response in uncommon mutation subtypes and inform clinical decision making will be increasingly important. Clinical trials of novel EGFR TKIs should prospectively account for the presence of uncommon mutation subtypes in study design.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1556-0864
1556-1380
1556-1380
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.014