Clinical and histological evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix allograft in combination with the coronally advanced flap in the treatment of miller class I recession defects: an experimental study in the mini-pig
Objectives: To study the wound healing of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allografts when used together with coronally advanced flaps (CAF) in the treatment of localized gingival recessions in the mini‐pig experimental model. Material and Methods: Dehiscence defects 4 × 5 mm were surgically created in...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 523 - 531 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2009
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives: To study the wound healing of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allografts when used together with coronally advanced flaps (CAF) in the treatment of localized gingival recessions in the mini‐pig experimental model.
Material and Methods: Dehiscence defects 4 × 5 mm were surgically created in one buccal root surface in each quadrant of PI, II, or III in three mini‐pigs. They were then treated with CAF and the interposition of either a connective tissue graft (CTG) or ADM. As the primary outcome, the histological interface between the ADM and the root surface was studied and was compared with CTG. As secondary outcomes, we assessed the amount and quality of the keratinized tissue and clinical outcomes in terms of root coverage and recession reduction.
Results: At 3 months, the CTG group attained a mean 76% root coverage, versus 62% in the ADM group. The histological interface with the root surface was similar in both groups. The apical migration of the epithelium was 1.79±0.46 mm for the CTG and 1.21±0.35 mm for ADM. Newly formed cementum was observed with both treatments. New bone and a newly formed periodontal ligament were shown in five specimens in the ADM group and in three in the CTG group.
Conclusion: Both materials showed similar clinical and histological outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JCPE1401 ark:/67375/WNG-V0NRDB8N-D istex:0BC5105D726F9D908D0BCE1106606AE6D27CC648 The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This study was partially sponsored by a research grant from BioHorizons Conflict of interest and sources of funding statement ® . ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01401.x |