Effect of Laser and Energy-based Device Therapies to Minimize Surgical Scar Formation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

• Published in: Acta dermato-venereologica Vol. 104; p. adv18477
• Main Authors: Yenyuwadee, Sasitorn, Achavanuntakul, Petchlada, Phisalprapa, Pochamana, Levin, Melissa, Saokaew, Surasak, Kanchanasurakit, Sukrit, Manuskiatti, Woraphong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sweden Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 08.01.2024; Medical Journals Sweden
• Subjects: Cicatrix - diagnosis; Cicatrix - etiology; Cicatrix - prevention & control; Databases, Factual; energy-based device; Humans; laser; Lasers, Dye; Low-Level Light Therapy; minimization; mitigation; Network Meta-Analysis; prevention; Review; Surgical scar
• ISSN: 0001-5555; 1651-2057
• DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.18477

Utilization of lasers and energy-based devices for surgical scar minimization has been substantially evaluated in placebo-controlled trials. The aim of this study was to compare reported measures of efficacy of lasers and energy-based devices in clinical trials in preventing surgical scar formation in a systematic review and network meta-analyses. Five electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials that reported on clinical outcomes of surgical scars with treatment initiation no later than 6 months after surgery and a follow-up period of at least 3 months. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials involving 482 participants and 671 postsurgical wounds were included in the network meta-analyses. The results showed that the most efficacious treatments were achieved using low-level laser therapy) (weighted mean difference -3.78; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -6.32, -1.24) and pulsed dye laser (weighted mean difference -2.46; 95% CI -4.53, -0.38). Nevertheless, low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser demonstrated comparable outcomes in surgical scar minimization (weighted mean difference -1.32, 95% CI -3.53, 0.89). The findings of this network meta-analyses suggest that low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser are both effective treatments for minimization of scar formation following primary closure of surgical wounds with comparable treatment outcomes.