Baricitinib vs tocilizumab treatment for hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 and associated cytokine storm: a prospective, investigational, real-world study
•Treatment of adults with severe COVID-19 and cytokine storm were compared.•In all, 102/463 patients received tocilizumab, and 361 of 463 received baricitinib.•At 28 days, there was no difference in all-cause mortality between subgroups.•No differences regarding side effects were observed between gr...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of infectious diseases Vol. 125; pp. 233 - 240 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2022
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Treatment of adults with severe COVID-19 and cytokine storm were compared.•In all, 102/463 patients received tocilizumab, and 361 of 463 received baricitinib.•At 28 days, there was no difference in all-cause mortality between subgroups.•No differences regarding side effects were observed between groups.
Our aim was to compare outcomes of hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 and cytokine storm treated with tocilizumab or baricitinib.
A prospective, investigational, real-world study was performed from April 2020 to April 2021 at our center. COVID-19 severity was classified by World Health Organization criteria, and cytokine storm was documented along predefined criteria. Eligible patients were enrolled at diagnosis if they fulfilled a priori inclusion criteria and received standard-of-care plus tocilizumab or baricitinib for >48 hours. Patients were followed per protocol for 28 days post-diagnosis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were invasive mechanical ventilation and major infectious complications.
Of 463 patients, 102/463 (22.1%) received tocilizumab, and 361/463 (77.9%) baricitinib. Baseline characteristics were balanced. At 28 days, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (22/102, 21.6% vs 64/361, 17.7%; P-value = 0.38). Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation was more frequent after tocilizumab (52/102, 50.9% vs 96/361, 26.6%; P <0.01), rate of major infectious complications was similar (32/102, 31.4% vs 96/361, 26.6%; P-value = 0.34). In logistic regression, the immunomodulatory drug was not retained as a predictor of all-cause mortality. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed statistically similar survival distributions.
All-cause mortality was similar between adults treated with baricitinib or tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 with cytokine storm. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.10.037 |