Hand-Washing Agents and Nosocomial Infections
To the Editor: The title of the report by Doebbeling et al. (July 9 issue) 1 is somewhat misleading. Although the chlorhexidine gluconate preparation is a hand-washing agent, the intended use of alcohol formulations is not hand-washing but hand disinfection. The error derives from the imprecise term...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 327; no. 19; pp. 1390 - 1391 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
05.11.1992
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To the Editor:
The title of the report by Doebbeling et al. (July 9 issue)
1
is somewhat misleading. Although the chlorhexidine gluconate preparation is a hand-washing agent, the intended use of alcohol formulations is not hand-washing but hand disinfection. The error derives from the imprecise terminology of hand-washing, hand disinfection, and hand antisepsis in the American literature.
2
When the authors state that the use of chlorhexidine reduces the rate of nosocomial infections more effectively than the use of alcohol, it is at least questionable whether their data have been correctly interpreted. If compliance with alcohol use in the cardiovascular intensive . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 ObjectType-Commentary-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Article-4 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199211053271914 |