Clinical evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring technology for assessment of patient oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment

• Published in: American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics Vol. 165; no. 5; pp. 586 - 592
• Main Authors: Snider, Vivian, Homsi, Karen, Kusnoto, Budi, Atsawasuwan, Phimon, Viana, Grace, Allareddy, Veerasathpurush, Gajendrareddy, Praveen, Elnagar, Mohammed H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Child; Dental Plaque - prevention & control; Dentistry; Female; Gingival Recession; Gingivitis; Humans; Male; Oral Hygiene; Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0889-5406; 1097-6752; 1097-6752
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.12.008

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the accuracy of Dental Monitoring’s (DM) artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis and oral hygiene notification algorithm in identifying oral hygiene and mucogingival conditions. Twenty-four patients seeking orthodontic therapy were monitored by DM oral hygiene protocol during their orthodontic treatment. During the bonding appointment and at each of 10 subsequent adjustment visits, a total of 232 clinical oral examinations were performed to assess the presence of the 3 oral hygiene parameters that DM monitors. In each clinical timepoint, the subjects took an oral DM scan and received a notification regarding their current oral status at that moment in time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to evaluate AI and clinical assessment of plaque, gingivitis, and recession. A total of 232 clinical time points have been evaluated clinically and by the DM AI algorithm. For DM’s AI detection of plaque and calculus, gingivitis, and recession, the sensitivity was 0.53, 0.35, and 0.22; the specificity was 0.94, 0.96, and 0.99; and the accuracy was 0.60, 0.49, and 0.72, respectively. DM’s oral hygiene notification algorithm has low sensitivity, high specificity, and moderate accuracy. This indicates a tendency of DM to underreport the presence of plaque, gingivitis, and recession. •Dental Monitoring’s (DM) oral hygiene notification algorithm has low sensitivity.•The DM algorithm also exhibits high specificity and moderate accuracy.•There is a tendency of DM to underreport the presence of plaque, gingivitis, and recession.